HTC Butterfly S Review: Evolution Complete: Synthetic Benchmarks

By 06:30 Fri, 13 Aug 2021 Comments


Synthetic benchmarks

The HTC Butterfly S uses the Snapdragon 600 chipset which continues to grow in popularity, even though the Snadragon 800 is about to go mass market.

The elegant Qualcomm APQ8064T SoC with Adreno 320 GPU is the same combo as the one found on the HTC One, except the quad-core Krait 300 Central Processing Units (CPU) is clocked at 1.9GHz, compared to the 1.7Giga Hertz (GHz) in the One. There's 2GB of RAM, same as on the HTC One, so overall we're expecting slightly higher, numbers here.

The 1.9Giga Hertz (GHz) clock speed of the Butterfly S's processor is amongst the highest around, and the results of the single-thread Central Processing Units (CPU) test Benchimprint Pi and the multi-thread Linpack and Geekbench 2 have the Galaxy S4 versions as its only real competitor.

.jrGraphContainer { background: none !important; border-bottom: 1px solid #eee !important;}

ul.jrGraph { left: 146px !important; }

ul.jrGraphControls { padding: 0; margin-left: -10px !important; }

JRGRAPH_EXPANDABLE_VERSION = false;

Benchimprint Pi

Lower is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    130

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)

    132

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    132

  • HTC Butterfly S

    135

  • LG Optimus G Pro

    147

  • HTC One

    151

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    166

  • Sony Xperia Z

    264

  • HTC Butterfly

    266

  • Oppo Find 5

    267

  • HTC One X+

    280

  • LG Optimus G

    285

  • HTC One mini

    293

  • Samsung Galaxy Note II

    305

  • HTC One X (Tegra 3)

    330

  • LG Optimus 4X HD

    350

  • Samsung Galaxy S III

    359

  • Nexus 4

    431

Linpack

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    818

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)

    791

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    788

  • LG Optimus G Pro

    743

  • HTC Butterfly S

    669

  • HTC One

    646

  • Sony Xperia Z

    630

  • HTC Butterfly

    624

  • LG Optimus G

    608

  • Oppo Find 5

    593

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    413

  • HTC One mini

    320

  • Samsung Galaxy Note II

    214.3

  • Nexus 4

    213.5

  • HTC One X+

    177.7

  • Samsung Galaxy S III

    175.5

  • HTC One X

    160.9

  • LG Optimus 4X HD

    141.5

Geekbench 2

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)

    3324

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    3227

  • HTC Butterfly S

    3170

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    3046

  • LG Optimus G Pro

    3040

  • HTC One

    2708

  • Sony Xperia Z

    2173

  • HTC Butterfly

    2143

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    1937

  • Samsung Galaxy S III

    1845

  • LG Optimus G

    1723

  • LG Optimus 4X HD

    1661

  • iPhone 5

    1601

  • HTC One mini

    1417

Quadrant and AnTuTu factor in overall device performance instead of just the CPU, and the Butterfly S shines again.

AnTuTu

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)

    26275

  • HTC Butterfly S

    25357

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    24716

  • HTC One

    22678

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    21363

  • Sony Xperia Z

    20794

  • LG Optimus G Pro

    20056

  • HTC Butterfly

    19513

  • Samsung Galaxy S III

    15547

  • Oppo Find 5

    15167

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    14518

  • HTC One mini

    11434

Quadrant

Higher is better

  • HTC Butterfly S

    13130

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)

    12446

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    12376

  • LG Optimus G Pro

    12105

  • HTC One

    11746

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    11346

  • Sony Xperia Z

    8075

  • HTC One X+

    7632

  • LG Optimus G

    7439

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    7153

  • Oppo Find 5

    7111

  • HTC One mini

    6048

  • HTC One X

    5952

  • Samsung Galaxy Note II

    5916

  • Samsung Galaxy S III

    5450

  • Nexus 4

    4567

We run both of the GLBenchimprint tests in offclassy screen mode, testing raw Central Processing Units (CPU) power. Here the Buttefly S was behind the Galaxy S4 Octa, but just barely.

GLBenchimprint 2.5 Egypt (1080p off-screen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)

    43

  • HTC Butterfly S

    42

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    41

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    41

  • HTC One

    37

  • Oppo Find 5

    32

  • Google Nexus 4

    32

  • Sony Xperia Z

    31

  • Sony Xperia ZL

    31

  • Sony Xperia SP

    31

  • Apple iPhone 5

    30

  • LG Optimus G Pro

    30

  • LG Optimus G

    21

  • Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3

    17

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    17

  • Samsung Galaxy Note II

    17

  • HTC One mini

    15

  • HTC One X

    11

GLBenchimprint 2.7 T-Rex (1080p off-screen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    17.1

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)

    17.1

  • Apple iPad 4

    16.8

  • HTC Butterfly S

    16

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    16

  • Google Nexus 10

    13.9

  • LG Optimus G

    13.9

  • Sony Xperia Z

    13.5

  • Sony Xperia Tablet Z

    13

  • Sony Xperia ZL

    12.8

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    6.4

  • Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3

    6.3

  • HTC One mini

    5.6

  • Samsung Galaxy Note II

    4.9

By the way, the Adreno 320 GPU on the Butterfly S supports OpenGL ES 3.0, which was recently added to Android (with 4.3) and that promised improved graphics. It's reasonable to expect even better graphics performance once Android 4.3 makes its way to this device.

The JavaScript performance of the HTC Butterfly S browser is close enough to that of the HTC One, but that extra bit of processing power helps push it past the other HTC flagship. In Vellamo we encountered our highest benchimprint score to date, reflecting unparalleled browsing performance from the Butterfly S.

SunSpider

Lower is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)

    804

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    810

  • Samsung Ativ S

    891

  • Apple iPhone 5

    915

  • Nokia Lumia 920

    910

  • Samsung Galaxy Note II

    972

  • HTC One X+

    1001

  • LG Optimus G Pro

    1011

  • HTC Butterfly S

    1046

  • Motorola RAZR i XT890

    1059

  • HTC One

    1124

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    1185

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    1196

  • Samsung Galaxy S III

    1192

  • HTC One mini

    1237

  • Sony Xperia Z

    1336

  • LG Optimus G

    1353

  • HTC Butterfly

    1433

  • Nexus 4

    1971

  • Oppo Find 5

    2045

BrowserMark 2

Higher is better

  • LG Optimus G

    2555

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    2438

  • HTC Butterfly S

    2378

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    2338

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    2314

  • HTC One

    2262

  • Sony Xperia Tablet Z

    2170

  • HTC One mini

    2164

  • Sony Xperia ZL

    2107

  • Sony Xperia Z

    2093

  • LG Optimus G Pro

    1801

  • Oppo Find 5

    1797

  • Nexus 4

    1794

  • Nokia Lumia 920

    1774

  • Google Nexus 10

    1773

  • HTC Butterfly

    1475

  • Samsung Galaxy S III

    1247

Vellamo

Higher is better

  • HTC Butterfly S

    2592

  • Samsung Galaxy Note II

    2418

  • HTC One

    2382

  • HTC One mini

    2252

  • Sony Xperia Z

    2189

  • HTC One X (Tegra 3)

    2078

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)

    2060

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)

    2056

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 mini

    2019

  • Samsung Galaxy S4 Active

    1936

  • HTC Butterfly

    1866

  • Oppo Find 5

    1658

  • Samsung Galaxy S III

    1641

  • LG Optimus 4X HD

    1568

  • LG Optimus G

    1522

  • Nexus 4

    1310

Overall, the HTC Butterfly S is about as fine as it gets in terms of processing power. The device is neck-and-neck with the Samsung Galaxy S4 versions in most tests, meaning that it has nothing to worry about in terms of both speed and future-proofing.


DOWNLOAD NOW

DOWNLOAD MUSIC





Related Article

Comment
Name




.....................

Please LOGIN or REGISTER To Gain Full Access To This Article