Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Review: Quality Control: ConclusionBy cheatmaster 03:33 Tue, 17 Aug 2021 Comments
As far as the design is concerned the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) lays a solid foundation for the company's upcoming mid-range smartphones. There'll be few people to complain as the phone looks better than its price tag recommends and is rocking top-notch build quality.
However, in terms of hardware the Galaxy J5 (2016) feels like a pretty minor update. The bigger classy screen and battery are always a fine way to lure customers in, but the chipset is feeling decidedly dated at this point. And the capturing camera certainly can't live up to the promises that its specs make.
Running the latest available Android - Marshmallow 6.0 and having 2GB of Random-Access Memory (RAM) assist haged things smooth, but we are left somewhat worried about things slowing down after longer usage. We'd say the Galaxy J5 (2016) polishes many of the rough edges of its predecessor, but simple refinement might not be enough to stay relevant in the quick developing mid-range market.
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016) Key test findings
- Excellent build quality and fine looking design
- Display has perfect colors and is always legible; The lower than the previous model pixel density isn't a real issue
- Decent battery life, but video playback could be better
- Full software package; Too much storage is reserved for the system though
- Snadpragon 410 chipset from previous year's model is a disappointment, but the phone runs rather smoothly
- Great multimedia app package with advanced music player, Frequency Modulation (FM) radio too
- The loudspeaker isn't on par with a large part of the competition
- Perfect audio quality if you have an external amp, but volume drops when you plug in headphones
- In sunny weather, the still image quality is good, but detail is lacking. Colors and contrast are excellent; Front-facing capturing camera with Light Emitting Diode (LED) delivers similar results; no HDR.
- Video quality at 1080p is lacking detail, but retains the fine colors and contrast from the still camera
You see the Galaxy J5 (2016) faces tons of competition, including plenty of other nice-looking phones. Starting off, we have the Oppo F1, which for its cheaper price tag features a more modern Snapdragon 616 chipset with 3GB of RAM. The classy screen is a tad smaller at 5.0", but the cameras on that one are better.
Yet another Chinese contender is the Xiaomi Redmi 3. With a price tag lower than the Galaxy J5 (2016) it again delivers a Snapdragon 616 chipset, but with just 2GB of RAM. However, you acquire a lot more battery for your money at 4,100mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi 3
The Sony Xperia M5 is an all around better device with waterproofing, scratch-resistant glass and Helio X10 chipset. The battery is a tad smaller, but we're okay to oversee that when we hold into consideration the phone's 1080p 5" display and 21MP snapper.
Sony Xperia M5
Huawei offers the P9lite, featuring its in-houtilize made Kirin 650 chipset, which is way more powerful than the S410. The 5.2" 1080p display is a noticeable jump over the 720p classy screen of the Galaxy J5, and the 13MP capturing camera with 27mm lens offers better shots.
Huawei P9 lite
Finally, the Moto G (3gen) is a nice option, boasting IPX7 certification. Its Snapdragon 410 is similar to the Galaxy J5 (2016), but the almost vanilla Android experience might be the preferred option for many.
Motorola Moto G (3rd gen)
All in all we are pleased with the change in styling that the Galaxy J5 (2016) brings. The company has been refining the looks and build quality of its devices lately and it has been producing some pretty handsets across the board.
However, in the case of the Galaxy J5 (2016) that seems to come at too high a cost. A quick see around the competition is enough to convince you that the Galaxy J5 (2016) finds itself out of its league. With better screens, capturing camera and chipsets easy to come by at this price point, the company will need to seriously consider a price slit if it is to give its smartphone a fighting chance.
Please LOGIN or REGISTER To Gain Full Access To This Article